For the start of the year, I'm sending you some helpful ideas, from how 
to keep student numbers down to keeping teachers in check.
I thought I would try to be positive and lay out a set of modest proposals for you to consider in 2013.
1 Universities 
It's imperative to keep down the number of students.
 "Graduate" is really another name for people who think they're entitled
 to be paid well. We are in an era when we must all pull together to 
ensure that workers work more and earn less (or as employers call it, 
"keeping labour costs down") and large numbers of graduates swimming 
around the economy are an impediment to this. What's more, three years 
of independent living and discussion have the potential to turn many of 
these young people into dissenters and trouble-makers. There is an 
argument for saying that it is the job of government to enable a 
population to increase its cultural capital, raising the level of 
education of as many people as possible. You must portray this sentiment
 as a utopian fantasy of a long-lost past
.
So, let's put into practice a set of clear policies:
a) You
 and your colleagues (and Eric Pickles) need to put a lot of effort into
 mocking and rubbishing university courses. Don't worry about 
consistency here: pick on both vocational courses and seemingly obscure 
academic ones: "A degree in leisure management, ha ha ha"; 'A degree in 
medieval German literature, ha ha ha".
b) Suggest
 at every opportunity that academics and students are spongers and 
skivers. Contrast their use of public money, long holidays and low hours
 of work with MPs' honesty, diligence and industriousness.
c) Make
 a big deal out of things like the "knowledge economy", "what Britain 
does best", "centres of excellence" and "world-class universities". Rely
 on journalists to put this inflated waffle (which you don't believe in 
anyway) on their front pages while relegating the cuts to a one-inch 
column on page 11.
d) It
 is absolutely vital to boast about making it possible for the 
"disadvantaged" to go to university while making it harder for them to 
do so. Fees of £9,000 a year are already much too low and some students 
from poorer families are slipping through the net and going to 
university. We must discourage them from doing so. I suggest fees in the
 region of £20,000 a year. One scholarship a year per university would 
serve the purpose of looking as if you're being "fair".
I am so 
glad that your colleague David Willetts has highlighted the problems of 
white working-class boys going to university. Given your party's 
electoral precariousness at the moment, it is vital that you and your 
colleagues present a narrative which suggests that Britain today is a 
place where white people can't get on and black people are given 
incredible advantages.
2 Ebacc
There is a 
real danger that you're about to be stabbed in the back by your 
predecessor Kenneth Baker. He has come up with a plan to abolish exams at 16, create higher schools
 and training places for 14- to 18-year-olds. With utmost urgency, you 
must dig up anything you can on Baker to suggest that he is either an 
out-of-touch old backwoodsman fart and/or he is in thrall to 
Trotskyists.
For you to be able to push through what is fast 
becoming an exam that will be a major impediment for most young people 
to develop as learners, you must:
a) ignore all evidence on adolescents and learning;
b) make misleading comparisons with the old O-levels;
c) keep talking about "rigour" without explaining what you mean by that word;
d) rubbish teachers by saying that, unlike MPs, they are lazy and misuse public money.
3 Primary school exams
  
The phonics screening check and the spelling, punctuation and grammar – Spag – test.
You
 must resist all demands to provide evidence that these tests will 
improve reading and writing, as there is none. Avoid public debate about
 this. Potential problems coming up are:
a) that many more children failed the phonics test than learn how to read using the old mixed methods;
b) many good readers failed the phonics test;
c) some children are being told they have "failed" and so can't proceed to "real" books.
Rely
 on ill-informed newspaper editors to keep these stories off the front 
pages. When it comes to the grammar test, I predict that there will be 
real problems, with teachers not knowing how to teach for it and hardly 
any children understanding what is being tested. Therefore you must keep
 up the campaign of rubbishing teachers, showing how, unlike MPs, they 
are lazy and misuse public money.
In a key speech, make the suggestion that most British children are ignorant, illiterate, stupid and badly behaved.
4 Academies programme
Stop
 trying to be nice. Step in now, and make every state school in England 
an academy. Hail this termination of public accountability as a triumph 
of "freedom from control". Make sure that your own burgeoning powers of 
control over the nation's teachers and young people is never mentioned. 
It is crucial that whenever an academy fails an inspection, you must 
rubbish the teachers, showing how, unlike MPs, they are lazy and misuse 
public money.
It is highly unlikely that you will be able to keep 
tabs on all the academies, so I suggest that you create a set of 
regional committees to manage them. These must not be called "local" in 
case people compare them to local authorities and the management 
committees must not be elected, but made up of people appointed by you.
5 Teachers
Abolish
 all teacher training. In a key speech, try to whip up people's bad 
memories of individual teachers (who were usually just people trying to 
implement what governments made them do) by saying how "we all hate 
teachers". Play to people's feelings that it is always other people's 
children who are "bad influences" on their own, and what is needed is a 
"firm hand". This should enable you to usher in the replacement of 
teachers by ex-military personnel who can do the job of patrolling past 
the computer terminals (equipped with News Corporation syllabuses), 
which all children will be looking at all day in the exciting schools of
 the future.
6 History
You must work even 
harder on the history curriculum, ensuring that all our children in 
England are proud of our country's history. I'm not absolutely sure what
 this means if Scotland becomes independent, but I'm sure you've figured
 out what "our country" means better than me. Meanwhile, can we make 
sure that dead white men are celebrated the most? All attempts to show 
either that some dead white men did bad things, or that there are some 
important things done by dead white women, dead black men and even dead 
black women, must be eradicated. We need to have our classrooms filled 
with pride. After all, thanks to your government, more and more children
 are arriving at school with empty bellies, so at least let's fill them 
with pride, eh?
7 Business
All schools must
 be turned into limited companies. Headteachers should be employers 
("school company directors") while compulsorily non-unionised teachers 
and pupils are the workers. Schools should be required to make goods and
 sell services for money and become places that offer car-cleaning, 
photocopying, fruit-picking, biscuit-making and the like at highly 
competitive rates.
8 Your job
The moment it
 looks as if staying in your job is an impediment to your long-term 
objectives of becoming leader of the Conservative party, make it clear 
to David Cameron that you've never been very interested in education and
 you have outlived your usefulness.
I hope that these proposals will be of use to you throughout the year.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jan/07/education-proposals-for-michael-gove
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment