Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.
Stock photography by Paul+Hughes at Alamy

Thursday, 30 June 2011

How meditation might ward off the effects of ageing.....

A study at a US Buddhist retreat suggests eastern relaxation techniques can protect our chromosomes from degenerating.

High in the mountains of northern Colorado, a 100-foot tall tower reaches up through the pinetops. Brightly coloured and strung with garlands, its ornate gold leaf glints in the sun. With a shape that symbolises a giant seated Buddha, this lofty stupa is intended to inspire those on the path to enlightenment.

Visitors here to the Shambhala Mountain Centre meditate in silence for up to 10 hours every day, emulating the lifestyle that monks have chosen for centuries in mountain refuges from India to Japan. But is it doing them any good? For two three-month retreats held in 2007, this haven for the eastern spiritual tradition opened its doors to western science. As attendees pondered the "four immeasurables" of love, compassion, joy and equanimity, a laboratory squeezed into the basement bristled with scientific equipment from brain and heart monitors to video cameras and centrifuges. The aim: to find out exactly what happens to people who meditate.

After several years of number-crunching, data from the so-called Shamatha project is finally starting to be published. So far the research has shown some not hugely surprising psychological and cognitive changes – improvements in perception and wellbeing, for example. But one result in particular has potentially stunning implications: that by protecting caps called telomeres on the ends of our chromosomes, meditation might help to delay the process of ageing.

It's the kind of claim more often associated with pseudoscience. Indeed, since researchers first started studying meditation, with its close links to religion and spirituality, they have had a tough time gaining scientific credibility. "A great danger in the field is that many researchers are also meditators, with a feeling about how powerful and useful these practices are," says Charles Raison, who studies mind-body interactions at Emory University in Atlanta. "There has been a tendency for people to be attempting to prove what they already know."

But a new generation of brain-imaging studies and robust clinical trials is helping to change that. Scientists from a range of fields are starting to compile evidence that rather than simply being a transient mental or spiritual experience, meditation may have long-term implications for physical health.

There are many kinds of meditation, including transcendental meditation, in which you focus on a repetitive mantra, and compassion meditation, which involves extending feelings of love and kindness to fellow living beings. One of the most studied practices is based on the Buddhist concept of mindfulness, or being aware of your own thoughts and surroundings. Buddhists believe it alleviates suffering by making you less caught up in everyday stresses – helping you to appreciate the present instead of continually worrying about the past or planning for the future.

"You pay attention to your own breath," explains Sara Lazar, a neuroscientist who studies the effects of meditation at Massachusetts general hospital in Boston. "If your mind wanders, you don't get discouraged, you notice the thought and think, 'OK'."

Small trials have suggested that such meditation creates more than spiritual calm. Reported physical effects include lowering blood pressure, helping psoriasis to heal, and boosting the immune response in vaccine recipients and cancer patients. In a pilot study in 2008, Willem Kuyken, head of the Mood Disorders Centre at Exeter University, showed that mindfulness meditation was more effective than drug treatment in preventing relapse in patients with recurrent depression. And in 2009, David Creswell of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh found that it slowed disease progression in patients with HIV.

Most of these trials have involved short courses of meditation aimed at treating specific conditions. The Shamatha project, by contrast, is an attempt to see what a longer, more intensive course of meditation might do for healthy people. The project was co-ordinated by neuroscientist Clifford Saron of the Centre for Mind and Brain at the University of California, Davis. His team advertised in Buddhist publications for people willing to spend three months in an intensive meditation retreat, and chose 60 participants. Half of them attended in the spring of 2007, while the other half acted as a control group before heading off for their own retreat in the autumn.

It sounds simple enough, but the project has taken eight years to organise and is likely to end up costing around $4m (partly funded by private organisations with an interest in meditation, including the Fetzer Institute and the Hershey Family Foundation). As well as shipping laptops all over the world to carry out cognitive tests on the volunteers before the study started, Saron's team built a hi-tech lab in a dorm room beneath the Shambhala centre's main hall, enabling them to subject participants and controls to tests at the beginning, middle and end of each retreat, and worked with "a village" of consulting scientists who each wanted to study different aspects of the meditators' performance. "It's a heroic effort," says neuroscientist Giuseppe Pagnoni, who studies meditation at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy.

Many of the tests focused on changes in cognitive ability or regulation of emotions. Soft white caps trailing wires and electrodes measured the meditators' brain waves as they completed gruelling computerised tasks to test their powers of attention, and video recordings captured split-second changes in facial expressions as they watched images of suffering and war.

But psychologist Elissa Epel, from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), wanted to know what the retreat was doing to the participants' chromosomes, in particular their telomeres. Telomeres play a key role in the ageing of cells, acting like a clock that limits their lifespan. Every time a cell divides, its telomeres get shorter, unless an enzyme called telomerase builds them back up. When telomeres get too short, a cell can no longer replicate, and ultimately dies.

It's not just an abstract concept. People with shorter telomeres are at greater risk of heart disease, diabetes, obesity, depression and degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. And they die younger.
Epel has been collaborating with UCSF's Elizabeth Blackburn, who shared the 2009 Nobel physiology or medicine prize for her work on telomeres, to investigate whether telomeres are affected by psychological factors. They found that at the end of the retreat, meditators had significantly higher telomerase activity than the control group, suggesting that their telomeres were better protected. The researchers are cautious, but say that in theory this might slow or even reverse cellular ageing. "If the increase in telomerase is sustained long enough," says Epel, "it's logical to infer that this group would develop more stable and possibly longer telomeres over time."

Pagnoni has previously used brain imaging to show that meditation may protect against the cognitive decline that occurs as we age. But the Shamatha project is the first to suggest that meditation plays a role in cellular ageing. If that link is confirmed, he says, "that would be groundbreaking".

So how could focusing on your thoughts have such impressive physical effects? The assumption that meditation simply induces a state of relaxation is "dead wrong", says Raison. Brain-imaging studies suggest that it triggers active processes within the brain, and can cause physical changes to the structure of regions involved in learning, memory, emotion regulation and cognitive processing.

The question of how the immaterial mind affects the material body remains a thorny philosophical problem, but on a practical level, "our understanding of the brain-body dialogue has made jaw-dropping advances in the last decade or two," says Raison. One of the most dramatic links between the mind and health is the physiological pathways that have evolved to respond to stress, and these can explain much about how meditation works.

When the brain detects a threat in our environment, it sends signals to spur the body into action. One example is the "fight or flight" response of the nervous system. When you sense danger, your heart beats faster, you breathe more rapidly, and your pupils dilate. Digestion slows, and fat and glucose are released into the bloodstream to fuel your next move. Another stress response pathway triggers a branch of the immune system known as the inflammatory response.

These responses might help us to run from a mammoth or fight off infection, but they also damage body tissues. In the past, the trade-off for short bursts of stress would have been worthwhile. But in the modern world, these ancient pathways are continually triggered by long-term threats for which they aren't any use, such as debt, work pressures or low social status. "Psychological stress activates these pathways in exactly the same way that infection does," says Raison.

Such chronic stress has devastating effects, putting us at greater risk of a host of diseases including diabetes, cancer, heart disease, depression – and death. It also affects our telomeres. Epel, Blackburn and their colleagues found in 2004 that stressed mothers caring for a chronically ill child had shorter telomeres than mothers with healthy children. Their stress had accelerated the ageing process.

Meditation seems to be effective in changing the way that we respond to external events. After short courses of mindfulness meditation, people produce less of the stress hormone cortisol, and mount a smaller inflammatory response to stress. One study linked meditators' lower stress to changes in the amygdala – a brain area involved in fear and the response to threat.

Some researchers think this is the whole story, because the diseases countered most by meditation are those in which stress plays a major role. But Epel believes that meditation might also trigger "pathways of restoration and enhancement", perhaps boosting the parasympathetic nervous system, which works in opposition to the fight or flight response, or triggering the production of growth hormone.

In terms of the psychological mechanisms involved, Raison thinks that meditation allows people to experience the world as less threatening. "You reinterpret the world as less dangerous, so you don't get as much of a stress reaction," he says. Compassion meditation, for example, may help us to view the world in a more socially connected way. Mindfulness might help people to distance themselves from negative or stressful thoughts.

The Shamatha project used a mix of mindfulness and compassion meditation. The researchers concluded that the meditation affected telomerase by changing the participants' psychological state, which they assessed using questionnaires. Three factors in particular predicted higher telomerase activity at the end of the retreat: increased sense of control (over circumstances or daily life); increased sense of purpose in life; and lower neuroticism (being tense, moody and anxious). The more these improved, the greater the effect on the meditators' telomerase.

For those of us who don't have time for retreats, Epel suggests "mini-meditations" – focusing on breathing or being aware of our surroundings – at regular points throughout the day. And though meditation seems to be a particularly effective route to reducing stress and protecting telomeres, it's not the only one. "Lots of people have no interest in meditation, and that's fine," says Creswell. Exercise has been shown to buffer the effects of stress on telomeres, for example, while stress management programmes and writing emotional diaries can help to delay the progression of HIV.

Indeed, Clifford Saron argues that the psychological changes caused by the Shamatha retreat – increased sense of control and purpose in life – are more important than the meditation itself. Simply doing something we love, whether meditating or gardening, may protect us from stress and maybe even help us to live longer. "The news from this paper is the profound impact of having the opportunity to live your life in a way that you find meaningful."

For a scientific conclusion it sounds scarily spiritual. But researchers warn that in our modern, work-obsessed society we are increasingly living on autopilot, reacting blindly to tweets and emails instead of taking the time to think about what really matters. If we don't give our minds a break from that treadmill, the physical effects can be scarily real.

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/apr/24/meditation-ageing-shamatha-project?INTCMP=SRCH

Mother-in-law's withering email to bride-to-be goes viral.........

Carolyn Bourne compared to snobbish sitcom character Hyacinth Bucket over description of stepson's fiancee.

A withering email to a "bad mannered" bride-to-be from her future mother-in-law has gone viral, prompting comparison between its author and the sitcom snob Hyacinth Bucket.

In the email sent to Heidi Withers, a PA from West London, last month, Carolyn Bourne describes her stepson Freddie's fiancee as "an ideal candidate for the Ladette to Lady television series", a reality TV show where drunken, foul-mouthed young women are taught the points of etiquette.

But Bourne has found herself compared to the show's comically sour-faced disciplinarians Mrs Harbord and Mrs Shrager – and the social climbing Bucket – after Withers forwarded the disparaging remarks to a few friends, which led to the email being sent on to thousands of people.

In the email, Bourne, 60, from Dawlish, Devon, apparently rebukes Withers, 29, for her behaviour during a visit to the family in April, which she describes as "staggering in its uncouthness and lack of grace".

Bourne, whose company website describes her as a breeder of "award winning perfumed Pinks and Dianthus", seemingly exemplifies the worst stereotypes of mothers-in-law and stepmothers by berating Withers for staying in bed too late, drawing attention to herself and wanting to get married in a castle. She also implies that the PA is marrying above her station and is a potential gold digger.

She writes: "If you want to be accepted by the wider Bourne family, I suggest you take some guidance from experts with utmost haste.

"Here are a few examples of your lack of manners: When you are a guest in another's house, you do not declare what you will and will not eat – unless you are positively allergic to something.

"You do not remark that you do not have enough food.
 You do not start before everyone else.
"You do not take additional helpings without being invited to by your host.
"When a guest in another's house, you do not lie in bed until late morning in households that rise early. You fall in line with house norms.
"You should never ever insult the family you are about to join at any time and most definitely not in public.
"You regularly draw attention to yourself. Perhaps you should ask yourself why. No one gets married in a castle unless they own it. It is brash, celebrity style behaviour.
"If your parents are unable to contribute very much towards the cost of your wedding, it would be most ladylike and gracious to lower your sights and have a modest wedding as befits both your incomes.
"One could be accused of thinking that Heidi Withers must be patting herself on the back for having caught a most eligible young man. I pity Freddie."

Bourne and her husband, Edward, 63, have declined to comment on the email. "We have nothing to say," they told the Evening Standard.

The prospective bridegroom Freddie Bourne, 29, from Putney, London, would also not be drawn on the apparent spat.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/30/mother-in-law-email-viral

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Sure-fire Methods to Beat Slot Machines.....

Are there any sure-fire methods for beating the slot machines?

http://www.slotadvisor.com/slot-machines.html

There are methods to improve your chances, but there are no guarantees you'll become a consistent winner on slot machines. It's tough to beat the slots when the house edge averages around 10 percent in brick-and-mortar establishments, ususally a little less at online casinos.
How do you try to conquer the one-armed bandits?
Click and Tell!


Playing slot machines is great fun. With proper strategies, playing the slots doesn't have to be tough on your bankroll and there is always the anticipation of hitting that big jackpot.


Here are the most important things you need to know if you want a better chance of beating those slot machines:


Slot Types: Walk into any land-basedcasino or log on to an Internet casino and you'll beconfronted with a bewildering assortment of slot machines. There are many different games, jackpot sizes, coin denominations and number of coin options.

All slot machines operate completely electronically, a computer chip, known as a Random Number Generator (RNG), determines what symbol combinations come up for every spin. That RNG is programmed to return to the players a certain percentage of all the money that the machine collects.

Payout Percentages:
The payback percentage on slot machines ranges between 80% to as high as 98%, depending on coin size and local competition. Generally, in brick-and-mortar casinos, the loosest slots can be found in Las Vegas. Nationally the average payout percentage is estimated to be around 90%. Online casinos do not have to pay for expensive real estate; they can afford more liberal payouts on their slot games.


Realize that payout percentages are calculated over thelong term, which could mean many millions of spins. If a slot machine is programmed to pay back 95% it will pay out $950,000 out of every one million dollars it takes in, but payouts will come in wildly fluctuating random fashion. A few players will collect huge jackpots, while all others will not be so lucky.

Know the Rules: Read the pay table and all instructions posted on slot machines. If you don't understand everything correctly ask an attendant or, if playing online, contact the casino's customer service center. It is your responsibility to know the rules concerning the number of coins to insert or how many lines need to be activated in order to collect prizes. Should you line up the jackpot symbols without having met the requirements, you'll get a sympathetic "sorry" but no money.


Loose Machines: When playing slot machines in land-based establishments, always look for the highest payout machines you can find. Some casinos advertise 98% percent payback. A slot holding just two percent! Great! But look closely at the advertisement, the fine print probably says "selected machines", or "up to 98%". The 98% machines probably won't be identified. It will be up to you to find them: Try asking casino personnel. Better yet, find out which machines are most popular with local players. Locals don't play tight slot machines.


Coin Denomination: Play the coindenomination that's right for the size of your bankroll. If playing progressives or slots that offer a bonus for playing maximum coins and the dollar level is too rich for your blood, drop down to the 25-cent machines. Look and compare. If the maximum payout on a dollar machine is $300 for single coin play, and a quarter machine pays $300 with three coins (75 cents) inserted, then the quarter machine is the better deal.


Progressive Jackpots: Play the progressives with maximum coins only. You won't collect the jackpot if you don't play the required number of coins. When selecting progressive machines be sure to look around for the best value. One bank of 25-cent slots can have a progressive jackpot of $2,654 while on another carousel nearby the top prize is 3,572. Always look for the best opportunity.

Jackpot Bonus: Always bet the maximum number of coins if the highest jackpot pays a bonus when all coins are played.Example, on a three-coin slot machine, the jackpot pays 1,000 for first coin, 2,000 for second coin and 5,000 for third coin.It's smart to play three coins and qualify for that extra 2,000 coin bonus. But if the third-coin payout was only 3,000 then there would not be any advantage in playing maximum coins.


Money Management: Set a loss limit before you enter a casino or before you go online. You know how much you are willing to risk or how much you can afford to lose. Disciplineyourself and stop playing once you've reached that pre-determinedlimit. For example, if you allotted $100 for this session, stop playing when you have either doubled your money or lost it all. Don't get greedy and don't get caught up in the "I need towin my money back" mentality.


Hit and Run: Continue to play the same slot machine only if it hits at an average of at least every three or four spins. Don't keep feeding a cold machine, hoping it will warm up. The longer you stay at any gambling activity, the greater the odds against you. The casino's built-in mathematical advantage takes effect. You want to "hit and run". Quit when you're ahead, you'll feel much better!

Choose from over 50 online slots at Bodog Casino, where you can play for free or for cash.


Slot Clubs: Land-based casinos give away millions of dollars in comps, free meals, free rooms,show tickets, invitations to slot tournaments, gifts, cash and more. You deserve your share. How much you get is generally based on the number of coins you cycle through the slot machines. Not all comp programs are alike, compare benefits at different casinos. Find out what their requirements are and choose the one that has the best deal for your level of play. Treat slot club comps as a form of profit, but never play slot machines just to get freebies. That's a trap casinos hope you'll fall into.


Online Casino Bonuses: Online casinos can't entice you with free meals or free rooms like their land-basedcounterparts, so in order to attract players they offer bonus money in various forms. The most popular is the new players welcome cash bonus. There are single deposit bonuses, multiple deposit bonuses, and even no deposit bonuses, where they give you money just so you'll try their casino. Be aware thatall bonus monies come with restrictions. Always read the"terms and conditions". Take advantage of the free money only if you find the casino's rules are acceptable.

If you play slots online, the most convenient andabsolutely secure way to deposit and withdraw funds quickly and easily is via Moneybookers. Click for details.


http://www.slotadvisor.com/slot-machines.html

The 10 best money saving websites.....

 By Martin Hickman.

Our list of top money-saving websites has been wildly popular on Independent.co.uk so in the tradition of crowd-pleasers, here is my top 10 budget-boosting sites for this year.

If you haven’t seen the original list, take a look – you may save a few pounds there too.

http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/the-10-best-money-saving-websites-2010613.html

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Herbal remedies banned as new EU rules take effect.....

Manufacturers and herbal practitioners say strict guidelines aimed at improving safety could force them out of business.

New EU rules came into force at the weekend banning hundreds of herbal remedies. The laws are aimed at protecting consumers from potentially damaging "traditional" medicines.

Under the directive, herbal medicines will now have to be registered. Products must meet safety, quality and manufacturing standards, and come with information outlining possible side-effects.

Herbal practitioners and manufacturers say they fear the new rules could force them out of business.
Research conducted for the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in 2009 showed that 26% of adults in the UK had taken a herbal medicine in the last two years, mostly bought over the counter in health food shops and pharmacies. Commonly used ingredients already registered include echinacea, which is used against colds, St John's wort, used for depression and anxiety, and valerian, which is claimed to ease insomnia.

The agency said it hoped to promote a more cautious approach to the use of herbal medicines after a study found that 58% of respondents believed these products were safe because they are "natural". In fact, herbal remedies can have harmful side-effects.

St John's Wort can stop the contraceptive pill working, while ginkgo and ginseng are known to interfere with the blood-thinning drug warfarin. And in February the MHRA issued a warning about the herbal weight loss product Herbal Flos Lonicerae (Herbal Xenicol) Natural Weight Loss Formula, after tests showed it contained more than twice the prescribed dose of a banned substance.

To date, the industry has been covered by the 1968 Medicines Act, drawn up when only a handful of herbal remedies were available and the number of herbal practitioners was very small.

From now, manufacturers will have to prove their products have been made to strict standards and contain a consistent and clearly marked dose. Remedies already on sale will be allowed to stay on the shelves until their expiry date. The agency said there had been 211 applications for approval of herbal remedies so far, with 105 granted and the rest still under consideration. Approved remedies will come with a logo marked THR.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/may/01/new-eu-rules-on-herbal-remedies?INTCMP=SRCH

Dr Luisa Dillner's guide to . . . drink and drugs in old age...

Up to one third of older people with alcohol problems develop them later in life – often in response to loss and stress.

If you'd planned to spend your twilight years knocking back sherry, you should read the latest report from the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Our Invisible Addicts says that people over 65 should ration their tipples. One and a half units a day is the recommended amount – less than half the amount for younger people. And you need to stop any illicit drug habits that you've kept on from earlier years. You may even need to look at the medicines you're taking because chances are, by the time you're over 65, you might not be taking them properly. About a third of those over 65 take four or more prescribed drugs a day.

Is drug abuse really a problem in older people?

Over-45s are treated as older people when it comes to abusing drugs, and in the north-west of England the proportion of over-45s seeking help for drug taking increased from 6.4% in 2003/4 to 10% in 2006/7.
What about alcohol?

About 21% of older men (over 65) drink more than four units of alcohol at least one day a week, as do 10% of women. This is on the increase in both sexes. Bereavement, loneliness, chronic or painful illness, difficulty in sleeping and depression can all lead to drinking more. Older men are more at risk than women. The report says 14% of men and 3% of women over 65 binge drink, although they tend to do so at home.

Does alcohol affect you differently as you get older?

Older people are more likely to be taking prescription drugs that interact with alcohol. They also have a reduction in their body water-to-fat ratio, which means less water to dilute the alcohol in. Blood flow to the liver is reduced, too, and on arrival there, the liver enzymes are less able to cope with alcohol. Alcohol has a stronger and faster depressant effect on the brain, causing memory loss and problems with coordination. It can therefore cause confusion and falls (more rapidly than in younger people). Elderly drivers are three times more likely to be involved in a car accident if they have been drinking. The Royal College of Physicians says 60% of people who repeatedly go into hospital with confusion or falls at home could have alcohol problems.

What can I do about it?

Well, you can be honest with yourself about how much you are drinking, or if you are still taking any illegal drugs. The report was written to encourage doctors to ask about these problems – they usually don't because they think older people just knit and drink tea.

Up to one third of older people with alcohol problems develop them later in life – often in response to loss and stress. A high intake of alcohol in older people can contribute to dementia (a different sort to other dementias), other mental health problems such as depression and anxiety, and liver disease. Not to mention falling over and hurting yourself. If you are concerned about your drinking, see your GP.

How much is safe to drink?

The report's guidelines says a safe limit is 1.5 units per day or 11 a week. A unit is half a pint of beer or 50ml of sherry. A small glass of wine (12% alcohol by volume) is one and a half units.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/27/luisa-dillner-drink-drugs-old-age

I think I`ll stick to orange juice and ice....

Cameron to urge public sector workers not to strike......

Prime minister will call on unions to keep negotiating after Monday talks failed to reach settlement to avoid Thursday's walkouts.

David Cameron will appeal directly to public sector workers not to go on strike this week, telling an audience of local government leaders that the current public sector pension arrangements are "not fair to the taxpayer".

The prime minister will intervene in the row between the government and unions over pension reforms after talks on Monday failed to negotiate a settlement to avoid mass walk-outs on Thursday.

Up to 750,000 teachers, lecturers and civil servants are preparing to strike over the reforms.

In a speech to the Local Government Association in Birmingham on Tuesday, Cameron is expected to say that the current system is "unsustainable" and reforms are inevitable.


The cabinet held a special session during its regular weekly meeting in Downing Street on Tuesday to discuss the likely impact of the strikes and contingency plans.

Sources said Cameron's speech would be "non-confrontational" and set out the case for making public sector pensions fairer for taxpayers.

His official spokesman said: "Our view is that reform of public sector pensions is necessary, that the proposals we have set out represent a fair deal for public sector workers and for the taxpayer, and that, as we are in the middle of discussions with the unions, strike action on Thursday is premature."


Monday's talks failed to reach any firm agreement, despite the government appearing to offer a significant compromise over local government pensions.

Two hours of negotiations left the unions and the government still fundamentally divided with major gaps in opinions unresolved, Brendan Barber, the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said.

Unions said they had made no progress on the most contentious proposals – to increase public sector workers' contributions, change the system of uprating schemes and raise the pension age for government employees.

But the biggest public sector union, Unison, indicated that the government had given enough ground on local government pensions for it to delay a strike ballot until later in the summer in the hope of further concessions.

The government described the talks as constructive and indicated that it was preparing to offer concessions on the local government scheme, which is funded and has 3.5 million mostly low-paid members.

There have been warnings that higher contributions could tip the scheme into surplus while forcing low-paid workers out.

Lord Hutton, the Labour former business secretary who drew up the blueprint for the coalition's pension reforms, warned last week that the proposed three percentage point increase in contributions might trigger a mass opt-out, jeopardising the viability of the scheme.

The minister for the Cabinet Office, Francis Maude, and the chief secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, said in a joint statement that the talks would now continue into July – although one Whitehall source also suggested there was no pressing deadline to end the negotiations before the pension contributions are due to kick in next April.

"We recognise that the funding basis for the local government pension scheme is different," the statement said.

"There are important implications for how the contributions and benefits interact, as both Lord Hutton and the unions have set out. On that basis, we have agreed to have a more in-depth discussion with local government unions and the TUC about how we take these factors into account. "While the talks are ongoing, it is obviously disappointing that some unions have decided on industrial action.

"But what the recent ballot results show is that there is extremely limited support for the kind of strike action union leaders are calling for. Less than 10% of the civil service workforce has voted for strike actions, and only about a third of teachers."

Barber said: "In some areas, it's clear that there is the possibility of agreement, but in terms of some of the key issues there is clearly a major gap between our position and that of the government.

"The strikes will be taking place on Thursday. Four unions balloted their members and reached that decision, and that reflects the degree of anger and worry and real fear there is across everyone who works for public sectors that their pensions are under threat."

Dave Prentis, the head of Unison, which has 1.2 million members in the pension scheme, said his union would not now ballot until after further talks in the summer, indicating that it had gone into the talks fully expecting to do so. "There was a sense that today we were in real negotiations," he said.

The Association of Teachers and Lecturers, the National Union of Teachers, the University and College Union and the PCS all confirmed they would strike on Thursday. Some unions have privately said they will stick with the talks, despite believing they are doomed, to avoid the public relations disaster of being perceived to be responsible for negotiations collapsing.

Unions and the government are eager to win over public opinion ahead of strikes. One ComRes poll suggested that although 55% of people believe the public will not support co-ordinated strikes, 78% agree it is unfair for low-paid public employees to "pay the price for mistakes made by bankers before the financial crisis".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jun/28/cameron-to-urge-public-sector-workers-not-strike